Suriname vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Suriname
28,048 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2010
East Timor
24,275 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
172nd
East Timor rank
173rd

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Suriname
  • East Timor
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k200020112023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 28,048 current LCU per square kilometre against 24,275 current LCU per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 3,773 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times East Timor's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Suriname ranks 172nd and East Timor ranks 173rd of 177 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 24,246 current LCU per square kilometre 11,957 current LCU per square kilometre 12,289 current LCU per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 28,048 current LCU per square kilometre 25,317 current LCU per square kilometre 2,732 current LCU per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Suriname or East Timor?
Suriname, at 28,048 current LCU per square kilometre against 24,275 current LCU per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2010.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Suriname and East Timor?
3,773 current LCU per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and East Timor?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
How do Suriname and East Timor rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Suriname ranks 172nd and East Timor ranks 173rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/suriname/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/suriname/timor-leste/">Suriname vs East Timor: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.