Serbia vs Togo: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Serbia
24.51 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo
22.75 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia rank
39th
Togo rank
41st

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Serbia
  • Togo
010.0M20.0M30.0M198020012023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 24.51 million current LCU per square kilometre against 22.75 million current LCU per square kilometre in Togo, a difference of 1.75 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 39th and Togo ranks 41st of 177 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Togo Difference Ahead
2000s 6.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 894,998 current LCU per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 9.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 12.05 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.69 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
2020s 19.61 million current LCU per square kilometre 20.96 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.34 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Serbia or Togo?
Serbia, at 24.51 million current LCU per square kilometre against 22.75 million current LCU per square kilometre in Togo as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Serbia and Togo?
1.75 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Togo?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Togo rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Serbia ranks 39th and Togo ranks 41st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Togo: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/serbia/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/serbia/togo/">Serbia vs Togo: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.