Mexico vs Uruguay: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Mexico
3.82 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
3.04 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
81st
Uruguay rank
84th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • Uruguay
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 3.82 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.04 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 776,270 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Uruguay's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 81st and Uruguay ranks 84th of 177 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 25.56 current LCU per square kilometre 0.1244 current LCU per square kilometre 25.44 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 138.6 current LCU per square kilometre 16.56 current LCU per square kilometre 122.04 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 12,619 current LCU per square kilometre 870.44 current LCU per square kilometre 11,749 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 276,691 current LCU per square kilometre 109,772 current LCU per square kilometre 166,919 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 425,894 current LCU per square kilometre 663,397 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 2.26 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.54 million current LCU per square kilometre 721,083 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 3.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.72 million current LCU per square kilometre 443,030 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Mexico or Uruguay?
Mexico, at 3.82 million current LCU per square kilometre against 3.04 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Mexico and Uruguay?
776,270 current LCU per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Uruguay rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 81st and Uruguay ranks 84th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Uruguay: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/uruguay/">Mexico vs Uruguay: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.