Malaysia vs Nicaragua: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Malaysia
1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
1.16 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia rank
110th
Nicaragua rank
108th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Malaysia
  • Nicaragua
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 1.16 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 88,840 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 110th and Nicaragua ranks 108th of 177 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2000s 452,845 current LCU per square kilometre 296,350 current LCU per square kilometre 156,495 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 868,841 current LCU per square kilometre 667,586 current LCU per square kilometre 201,255 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 968,569 current LCU per square kilometre 940,214 current LCU per square kilometre 28,355 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Malaysia or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 1.16 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Malaysia and Nicaragua?
88,840 current LCU per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Nicaragua?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Nicaragua rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Malaysia ranks 110th and Nicaragua ranks 108th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Nicaragua: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/nicaragua/">Malaysia vs Nicaragua: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.