Madagascar vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Madagascar
25.01 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
24.51 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar rank
38th
Serbia rank
39th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Madagascar
  • Serbia
010.0M20.0M30.0M197019962023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 25.01 million current LCU per square kilometre against 24.51 million current LCU per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 502,900 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Madagascar ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 39th of 177 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 8.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.15 million current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 11.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.58 million current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 21.80 million current LCU per square kilometre 19.61 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.19 million current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Madagascar or Serbia?
Madagascar, at 25.01 million current LCU per square kilometre against 24.51 million current LCU per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Madagascar and Serbia?
502,900 current LCU per square kilometre, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Madagascar ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 39th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/serbia/">Madagascar vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.