Latvia vs Zambia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Latvia
152,730 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
198,232 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
153rd
Zambia rank
150th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • Zambia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199520092023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 198,232 current LCU per square kilometre against 152,730 current LCU per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 45,502 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 153rd and Zambia ranks 150th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Zambia Difference Ahead
2010s 86,089 current LCU per square kilometre 84,477 current LCU per square kilometre 1,612 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 128,721 current LCU per square kilometre 167,042 current LCU per square kilometre 38,320 current LCU per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Latvia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 198,232 current LCU per square kilometre against 152,730 current LCU per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Latvia and Zambia?
45,502 current LCU per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zambia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Zambia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 153rd and Zambia ranks 150th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zambia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zambia/">Latvia vs Zambia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.