Latvia vs Peru: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Latvia
152,730 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
165,486 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
153rd
Peru rank
151st

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • Peru
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 165,486 current LCU per square kilometre against 152,730 current LCU per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 12,756 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.

Latvia ranks 153rd and Peru ranks 151st of 177 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 16,418 current LCU per square kilometre 26,420 current LCU per square kilometre 10,002 current LCU per square kilometre Peru
2000s 66,356 current LCU per square kilometre 38,664 current LCU per square kilometre 27,692 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 86,089 current LCU per square kilometre 105,174 current LCU per square kilometre 19,085 current LCU per square kilometre Peru
2020s 128,721 current LCU per square kilometre 151,308 current LCU per square kilometre 22,587 current LCU per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Latvia or Peru?
Peru, at 165,486 current LCU per square kilometre against 152,730 current LCU per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Latvia and Peru?
12,756 current LCU per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Peru?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Peru rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 153rd and Peru ranks 151st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Peru: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/peru/">Latvia vs Peru: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.