Kiribati vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Kiribati
133,740 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
151,670 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
156th
Tunisia rank
154th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Tunisia
050.0k100.0k150.0k196519942023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 151,670 current LCU per square kilometre against 133,740 current LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 17,930 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Tunisia ahead.

Kiribati ranks 156th and Tunisia ranks 154th of 177 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 32,329 current LCU per square kilometre 79,110 current LCU per square kilometre 46,782 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 74,594 current LCU per square kilometre 123,696 current LCU per square kilometre 49,102 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 95,178 current LCU per square kilometre 138,560 current LCU per square kilometre 43,382 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Kiribati or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 151,670 current LCU per square kilometre against 133,740 current LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Kiribati and Tunisia?
17,930 current LCU per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tunisia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Tunisia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 156th and Tunisia ranks 154th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/tunisia/">Kiribati vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.