Kiribati vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Kiribati
133,740 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
152,730 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
156th
Latvia rank
153rd

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Latvia
050.0k100.0k150.0k199520092023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 152,730 current LCU per square kilometre against 133,740 current LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 18,990 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Latvia ahead.

Kiribati ranks 156th and Latvia ranks 153rd of 177 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 32,329 current LCU per square kilometre 104,427 current LCU per square kilometre 72,099 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 74,594 current LCU per square kilometre 86,089 current LCU per square kilometre 11,495 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 95,178 current LCU per square kilometre 128,721 current LCU per square kilometre 33,543 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Kiribati or Latvia?
Latvia, at 152,730 current LCU per square kilometre against 133,740 current LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Kiribati and Latvia?
18,990 current LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Latvia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Latvia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 156th and Latvia ranks 153rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/latvia/">Kiribati vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.