Iraq vs Sri Lanka: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Iraq
101.61 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
80.87 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
23rd
Sri Lanka rank
26th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Iraq
  • Sri Lanka
050.0M100.0M150.0M196119922023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 101.61 million current LCU per square kilometre against 80.87 million current LCU per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 20.74 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Iraq's figure about 1.3 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Iraq ranks 23rd and Sri Lanka ranks 26th of 177 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 2,309 current LCU per square kilometre 75,372 current LCU per square kilometre 73,064 current LCU per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 11,093 current LCU per square kilometre 606,040 current LCU per square kilometre 594,947 current LCU per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 381,310 current LCU per square kilometre 2.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.27 million current LCU per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 19.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.12 million current LCU per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 94.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 67.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 26.50 million current LCU per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 76.02 million current LCU per square kilometre 78.39 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.37 million current LCU per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Iraq or Sri Lanka?
Iraq, at 101.61 million current LCU per square kilometre against 80.87 million current LCU per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Iraq and Sri Lanka?
20.74 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Sri Lanka?
49 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Sri Lanka rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Iraq ranks 23rd and Sri Lanka ranks 26th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Sri Lanka: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iraq/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iraq/sri-lanka/">Iraq vs Sri Lanka: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.