India vs Madagascar: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

India
31.10 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar
25.01 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
35th
Madagascar rank
38th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • India
  • Madagascar
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 31.10 million current LCU per square kilometre against 25.01 million current LCU per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 6.09 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.2 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was India ahead.

India ranks 35th and Madagascar ranks 38th of 177 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, India averaged higher in 4 and Madagascar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Madagascar Difference Ahead
1970s 49,610 current LCU per square kilometre 15,338 current LCU per square kilometre 34,272 current LCU per square kilometre India
1980s 218,147 current LCU per square kilometre 252,517 current LCU per square kilometre 34,371 current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 1.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 850,932 current LCU per square kilometre 153,694 current LCU per square kilometre India
2000s 4.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.96 million current LCU per square kilometre 865,575 current LCU per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 13.63 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.69 million current LCU per square kilometre India
2020s 25.31 million current LCU per square kilometre 21.80 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.51 million current LCU per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, India or Madagascar?
India, at 31.10 million current LCU per square kilometre against 25.01 million current LCU per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between India and Madagascar?
6.09 million current LCU per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Madagascar?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do India and Madagascar rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
India ranks 35th and Madagascar ranks 38th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Madagascar: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/india/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/india/madagascar/">India vs Madagascar: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.