Hungary vs Rwanda: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Hungary
210.62 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
236.87 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
13th
Rwanda rank
11th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Hungary
  • Rwanda
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M196519942023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 236.87 million current LCU per square kilometre against 210.62 million current LCU per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 26.24 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 177 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 16.57 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.62 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.95 million current LCU per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 56.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 17.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 38.51 million current LCU per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 85.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 55.78 million current LCU per square kilometre 29.64 million current LCU per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 179.28 million current LCU per square kilometre 160.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 18.34 million current LCU per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Hungary or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 236.87 million current LCU per square kilometre against 210.62 million current LCU per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Hungary and Rwanda?
26.24 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Rwanda?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Rwanda rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Hungary ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Rwanda: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hungary/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hungary/rwanda/">Hungary vs Rwanda: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.