Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Greenland
19,368 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
16,897 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
175th
Zimbabwe rank
176th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Greenland
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 19,368 current LCU per square kilometre against 16,897 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2,471 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Greenland's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.

Greenland ranks 175th and Zimbabwe ranks 176th of 177 countries.

Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 7,837 current LCU per square kilometre 0.3987 current LCU per square kilometre 7,837 current LCU per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 13,167 current LCU per square kilometre 5.33 current LCU per square kilometre 13,161 current LCU per square kilometre Greenland
2020s 18,523 current LCU per square kilometre 4,725 current LCU per square kilometre 13,798 current LCU per square kilometre Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Greenland or Zimbabwe?
Greenland, at 19,368 current LCU per square kilometre against 16,897 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Greenland and Zimbabwe?
2,471 current LCU per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zimbabwe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Greenland ranks 175th and Zimbabwe ranks 176th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/">Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.