France vs Guatemala: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

France
1.20 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
1.25 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
France rank
107th
Guatemala rank
106th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • France
  • Guatemala
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 1.25 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.20 million current LCU per square kilometre in France, a difference of 48,590 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was France ahead.

France ranks 107th and Guatemala ranks 106th of 177 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 37,347 current LCU per square kilometre 1,540 current LCU per square kilometre 35,807 current LCU per square kilometre France
1970s 110,378 current LCU per square kilometre 6,171 current LCU per square kilometre 104,207 current LCU per square kilometre France
1980s 300,091 current LCU per square kilometre 15,787 current LCU per square kilometre 284,305 current LCU per square kilometre France
1990s 459,779 current LCU per square kilometre 117,447 current LCU per square kilometre 342,331 current LCU per square kilometre France
2000s 690,577 current LCU per square kilometre 359,264 current LCU per square kilometre 331,314 current LCU per square kilometre France
2010s 872,392 current LCU per square kilometre 620,225 current LCU per square kilometre 252,167 current LCU per square kilometre France
2020s 1.10 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.04 million current LCU per square kilometre 59,202 current LCU per square kilometre France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, France or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 1.25 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.20 million current LCU per square kilometre in France as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between France and Guatemala?
48,590 current LCU per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do France and Guatemala rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
France ranks 107th and Guatemala ranks 106th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Guatemala: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/france/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/france/guatemala/">France vs Guatemala: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.