How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Palestine?

11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Palestine: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Eswatini

797,669 current LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Palestine

729,544 current LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Eswatini rank

115th

Palestine rank

117th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

Eswatini
Palestine

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 797,669 current LCU per square kilometre against 729,544 current LCU per square kilometre in Palestine, a difference of 68,125 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Palestine's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Palestine ahead.

Eswatini ranks 115th and Palestine ranks 117th of 177 countries.

Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Palestine	Difference	Ahead
2010s	529,944 current LCU per square kilometre	611,713 current LCU per square kilometre	81,769 current LCU per square kilometre	Palestine
2020s	695,748 current LCU per square kilometre	707,292 current LCU per square kilometre	11,543 current LCU per square kilometre	Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Palestine?: Eswatini, at 797,669 current LCU per square kilometre against 729,544 current LCU per square kilometre in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Palestine?: 68,125 current LCU per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Palestine?: 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Palestine rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?: Eswatini ranks 115th and Palestine ranks 117th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Palestine: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/">Eswatini vs Palestine: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: current LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 07 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.