Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Equatorial Guinea
23.38 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
24.51 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
40th
Serbia rank
39th
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 24.51 million current LCU per square kilometre against 23.38 million current LCU per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.13 million current LCU per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Serbia ranks 39th of 177 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.75 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.84 million current LCU per square kilometre | 78.91 million current LCU per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 87.72 million current LCU per square kilometre | 9.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | 78.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 20.31 million current LCU per square kilometre | 19.61 million current LCU per square kilometre | 695,525 current LCU per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 24.51 million current LCU per square kilometre against 23.38 million current LCU per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
- 1.13 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Serbia ranks 39th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.