Cyprus vs South Africa: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Cyprus
771,895 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
866,432 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
116th
South Africa rank
113th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cyprus
  • South Africa
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 866,432 current LCU per square kilometre against 771,895 current LCU per square kilometre in Cyprus, a difference of 94,537 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 116th and South Africa ranks 113th of 177 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 4 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 23,495 current LCU per square kilometre 9,209 current LCU per square kilometre 14,286 current LCU per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 71,861 current LCU per square kilometre 27,408 current LCU per square kilometre 44,453 current LCU per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 171,721 current LCU per square kilometre 79,425 current LCU per square kilometre 92,296 current LCU per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 362,295 current LCU per square kilometre 262,422 current LCU per square kilometre 99,874 current LCU per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 372,164 current LCU per square kilometre 612,255 current LCU per square kilometre 240,090 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 615,868 current LCU per square kilometre 737,338 current LCU per square kilometre 121,470 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Cyprus or South Africa?
South Africa, at 866,432 current LCU per square kilometre against 771,895 current LCU per square kilometre in Cyprus as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Cyprus and South Africa?
94,537 current LCU per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and South Africa?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and South Africa rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Cyprus ranks 116th and South Africa ranks 113th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs South Africa: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/south-africa/">Cyprus vs South Africa: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.