Cuba vs Malaysia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Cuba
1.03 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
111th
Malaysia rank
110th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Malaysia
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.03 million current LCU per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 40,410 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 111th and Malaysia ranks 110th of 177 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Malaysia Difference Ahead
1970s 23,628 current LCU per square kilometre 17,928 current LCU per square kilometre 5,700 current LCU per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 45,297 current LCU per square kilometre 68,155 current LCU per square kilometre 22,858 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 27,944 current LCU per square kilometre 230,521 current LCU per square kilometre 202,577 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 40,586 current LCU per square kilometre 358,631 current LCU per square kilometre 318,045 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 73,685 current LCU per square kilometre 868,841 current LCU per square kilometre 795,156 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 595,134 current LCU per square kilometre 968,569 current LCU per square kilometre 373,434 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Cuba or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.03 million current LCU per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Cuba and Malaysia?
40,410 current LCU per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malaysia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Malaysia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 111th and Malaysia ranks 110th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Malaysia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/malaysia/">Cuba vs Malaysia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.