Croatia vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Croatia
350,179 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
360,635 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia rank
133rd
Panama rank
132nd

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Croatia
  • Panama
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 360,635 current LCU per square kilometre against 350,179 current LCU per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 10,456 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 133rd and Panama ranks 132nd of 177 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 67,254 current LCU per square kilometre 30,523 current LCU per square kilometre 36,731 current LCU per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 156,935 current LCU per square kilometre 55,118 current LCU per square kilometre 101,817 current LCU per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 168,206 current LCU per square kilometre 262,876 current LCU per square kilometre 94,669 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
2020s 258,256 current LCU per square kilometre 274,292 current LCU per square kilometre 16,036 current LCU per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Croatia or Panama?
Panama, at 360,635 current LCU per square kilometre against 350,179 current LCU per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Croatia and Panama?
10,456 current LCU per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Panama?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Panama rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Croatia ranks 133rd and Panama ranks 132nd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/croatia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/croatia/panama/">Croatia vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.