Chile vs Tanzania: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
92.65 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
90.84 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
24th
Tanzania rank
25th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Tanzania
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 92.65 million current LCU per square kilometre against 90.84 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 1.81 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 24th and Tanzania ranks 25th of 177 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 8.91 million current LCU per square kilometre 840,602 current LCU per square kilometre 8.07 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2000s 21.03 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 14.08 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2010s 50.75 million current LCU per square kilometre 36.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 14.32 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2020s 79.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 80.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 184,900 current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Tanzania?
Chile, at 92.65 million current LCU per square kilometre against 90.84 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Tanzania?
1.81 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chile and Tanzania rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 24th and Tanzania ranks 25th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Tanzania: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/tanzania/">Chile vs Tanzania: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.