Central African Republic vs Croatia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
363,145 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia
350,179 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
131st
Croatia rank
133rd

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Croatia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k197720002023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 363,145 current LCU per square kilometre against 350,179 current LCU per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 12,966 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 131st and Croatia ranks 133rd of 177 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Croatia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 88,910 current LCU per square kilometre 67,254 current LCU per square kilometre 21,656 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 123,628 current LCU per square kilometre 156,935 current LCU per square kilometre 33,307 current LCU per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 293,339 current LCU per square kilometre 168,206 current LCU per square kilometre 125,132 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 366,234 current LCU per square kilometre 258,256 current LCU per square kilometre 107,978 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Croatia?
Central African Republic, at 363,145 current LCU per square kilometre against 350,179 current LCU per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Croatia?
12,966 current LCU per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Croatia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Croatia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 131st and Croatia ranks 133rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Croatia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/croatia/">Central African Republic vs Croatia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.