Canada vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Canada
77,736 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
96,656 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
164th
Ecuador rank
161st

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Canada
  • Ecuador
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 96,656 current LCU per square kilometre against 77,736 current LCU per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 18,920 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 164th and Ecuador ranks 161st of 177 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 5 and Ecuador in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 1,568 current LCU per square kilometre 873.8 current LCU per square kilometre 694.18 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
1970s 4,524 current LCU per square kilometre 4,162 current LCU per square kilometre 362.54 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
1980s 11,984 current LCU per square kilometre 9,082 current LCU per square kilometre 2,902 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
1990s 18,076 current LCU per square kilometre 11,111 current LCU per square kilometre 6,965 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
2000s 33,197 current LCU per square kilometre 26,144 current LCU per square kilometre 7,053 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
2010s 51,903 current LCU per square kilometre 82,933 current LCU per square kilometre 31,031 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 69,755 current LCU per square kilometre 86,334 current LCU per square kilometre 16,579 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Canada or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 96,656 current LCU per square kilometre against 77,736 current LCU per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Canada and Ecuador?
18,920 current LCU per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Ecuador rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Canada ranks 164th and Ecuador ranks 161st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/ecuador/">Canada vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.