Botswana vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
118,694 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
133,740 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
158th
Kiribati rank
156th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Kiribati
050.0k100.0k150.0k196519942023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 133,740 current LCU per square kilometre against 118,694 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 15,046 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kiribati ahead.

Botswana ranks 158th and Kiribati ranks 156th of 177 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 29,452 current LCU per square kilometre 32,329 current LCU per square kilometre 2,876 current LCU per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 65,554 current LCU per square kilometre 74,594 current LCU per square kilometre 9,040 current LCU per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 101,837 current LCU per square kilometre 95,178 current LCU per square kilometre 6,659 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 133,740 current LCU per square kilometre against 118,694 current LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Kiribati?
15,046 current LCU per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Kiribati rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 158th and Kiribati ranks 156th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/kiribati/">Botswana vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.