Botswana vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
118,694 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
96,656 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
158th
Ecuador rank
161st

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Ecuador
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 118,694 current LCU per square kilometre against 96,656 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 22,038 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Ecuador ahead.

Botswana ranks 158th and Ecuador ranks 161st of 177 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 17.35 current LCU per square kilometre 993.09 current LCU per square kilometre 975.74 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 152.35 current LCU per square kilometre 4,162 current LCU per square kilometre 4,010 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 1,252 current LCU per square kilometre 9,082 current LCU per square kilometre 7,830 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 6,623 current LCU per square kilometre 11,111 current LCU per square kilometre 4,488 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 22,398 current LCU per square kilometre 26,144 current LCU per square kilometre 3,746 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 65,554 current LCU per square kilometre 82,933 current LCU per square kilometre 17,379 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 101,837 current LCU per square kilometre 86,334 current LCU per square kilometre 15,503 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Ecuador?
Botswana, at 118,694 current LCU per square kilometre against 96,656 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Ecuador?
22,038 current LCU per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Ecuador rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 158th and Ecuador ranks 161st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/">Botswana vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.