Bolivia vs Eritrea: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Bolivia
59,120 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea
33,106 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2011
Bolivia rank
167th
Eritrea rank
170th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Eritrea
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197019962023

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 59,120 current LCU per square kilometre against 33,106 current LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 26,014 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.8 times Eritrea's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.

Bolivia ranks 167th and Eritrea ranks 170th of 177 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 6,224 current LCU per square kilometre 12,961 current LCU per square kilometre 6,737 current LCU per square kilometre Eritrea
2000s 11,285 current LCU per square kilometre 24,642 current LCU per square kilometre 13,356 current LCU per square kilometre Eritrea
2010s 25,097 current LCU per square kilometre 29,054 current LCU per square kilometre 3,957 current LCU per square kilometre Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Bolivia or Eritrea?
Bolivia, at 59,120 current LCU per square kilometre against 33,106 current LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Bolivia and Eritrea?
26,014 current LCU per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Eritrea?
19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
How do Bolivia and Eritrea rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 167th and Eritrea ranks 170th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Eritrea: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/eritrea/">Bolivia vs Eritrea: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.