Belgium vs Curacao: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Belgium
4.77 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Curacao
4.18 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2018
Belgium rank
75th
Curacao rank
78th
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time
- Belgium
- Curacao
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 4.77 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.18 million current LCU per square kilometre in Curacao, a difference of 589,870 current LCU per square kilometre.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Curacao's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Curacao has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 75th and Curacao ranks 78th of 177 countries.
Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Belgium or Curacao?
- Belgium, at 4.77 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.18 million current LCU per square kilometre in Curacao as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Belgium and Curacao?
- 589,870 current LCU per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Curacao?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
- How do Belgium and Curacao rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Belgium ranks 75th and Curacao ranks 78th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.