Belarus vs Georgia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Belarus
242,206 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
249,784 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
144th
Georgia rank
143rd

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Georgia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199220072023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 249,784 current LCU per square kilometre against 242,206 current LCU per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 7,578 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Belarus ranks 144th and Georgia ranks 143rd of 177 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 70.75 current LCU per square kilometre 8,005 current LCU per square kilometre 7,935 current LCU per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 9,772 current LCU per square kilometre 41,392 current LCU per square kilometre 31,620 current LCU per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 115,440 current LCU per square kilometre 113,433 current LCU per square kilometre 2,006 current LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 202,909 current LCU per square kilometre 199,388 current LCU per square kilometre 3,520 current LCU per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Belarus or Georgia?
Georgia, at 249,784 current LCU per square kilometre against 242,206 current LCU per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Belarus and Georgia?
7,578 current LCU per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 144th and Georgia ranks 143rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Georgia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/">Belarus vs Georgia: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.