Bangladesh vs Costa Rica: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
106.94 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
155.19 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
22nd
Costa Rica rank
19th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Costa Rica
050.0M100.0M150.0M196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 155.19 million current LCU per square kilometre against 106.94 million current LCU per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 48.25 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.5 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 22nd and Costa Rica ranks 19th of 177 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1980s 693,241 current LCU per square kilometre 770,465 current LCU per square kilometre 77,224 current LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 2.49 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.64 million current LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 8.62 million current LCU per square kilometre 41.21 million current LCU per square kilometre 32.59 million current LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 38.86 million current LCU per square kilometre 106.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 67.46 million current LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 91.26 million current LCU per square kilometre 141.03 million current LCU per square kilometre 49.77 million current LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 155.19 million current LCU per square kilometre against 106.94 million current LCU per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Costa Rica?
48.25 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Costa Rica?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Costa Rica rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 22nd and Costa Rica ranks 19th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Costa Rica: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/costa-rica/">Bangladesh vs Costa Rica: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.