Argentina vs Pakistan: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
13.00 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
13.30 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
52nd
Pakistan rank
51st

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Pakistan
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 13.30 million current LCU per square kilometre against 13.00 million current LCU per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 299,800 current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 52nd and Pakistan ranks 51st of 177 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 6,251 current LCU per square kilometre 6,251 current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 21,395 current LCU per square kilometre 21,395 current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 19.42 current LCU per square kilometre 101,519 current LCU per square kilometre 101,500 current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 15,832 current LCU per square kilometre 386,910 current LCU per square kilometre 371,078 current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 39,313 current LCU per square kilometre 1.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.69 million current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 415,654 current LCU per square kilometre 5.34 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.92 million current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 5.67 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.66 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.99 million current LCU per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 13.30 million current LCU per square kilometre against 13.00 million current LCU per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Pakistan?
299,800 current LCU per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Pakistan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 52nd and Pakistan ranks 51st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Pakistan: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/pakistan/">Argentina vs Pakistan: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.