Saudi Arabia vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Sweden
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 1.38 trillion constant LCU against 1.35 trillion constant LCU in Sweden, a difference of 31.80 billion constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sweden ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 49th and Sweden ranks 50th of 167 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 412.86 billion constant LCU | 842.87 billion constant LCU | 430.01 billion constant LCU | Sweden |
| 2010s | 918.03 billion constant LCU | 1.07 trillion constant LCU | 152.71 billion constant LCU | Sweden |
| 2020s | 1.19 trillion constant LCU | 1.31 trillion constant LCU | 118.27 billion constant LCU | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Saudi Arabia or Sweden?
- Saudi Arabia, at 1.38 trillion constant LCU against 1.35 trillion constant LCU in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Saudi Arabia and Sweden?
- 31.80 billion constant LCU, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Sweden rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 49th and Sweden ranks 50th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.