Niger vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Niger
- Serbia
How they compare
Niger currently reports 2.43 trillion constant LCU against 1.85 trillion constant LCU in Serbia, a difference of 581.13 billion constant LCU.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Niger ahead.
Niger ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 45th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 332.45 billion constant LCU | 334.08 billion constant LCU | 1.64 billion constant LCU | Serbia |
| 2000s | 656.19 billion constant LCU | 692.94 billion constant LCU | 36.75 billion constant LCU | Serbia |
| 2010s | 1.77 trillion constant LCU | 954.25 billion constant LCU | 818.53 billion constant LCU | Niger |
| 2020s | 2.66 trillion constant LCU | 1.63 trillion constant LCU | 1.03 trillion constant LCU | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Niger or Serbia?
- Niger, at 2.43 trillion constant LCU against 1.85 trillion constant LCU in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Niger and Serbia?
- 581.13 billion constant LCU, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Serbia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Niger and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Niger ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 45th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.