Latvia vs Lesotho: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Latvia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 9.02 billion constant LCU against 7.72 billion constant LCU in Latvia, a difference of 1.29 billion constant LCU.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lesotho ahead.
Latvia ranks 138th and Lesotho ranks 135th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.22 billion constant LCU | 3.29 billion constant LCU | 1.07 billion constant LCU | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 6.19 billion constant LCU | 3.32 billion constant LCU | 2.88 billion constant LCU | Latvia |
| 2010s | 6.01 billion constant LCU | 6.58 billion constant LCU | 561.94 million constant LCU | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 7.24 billion constant LCU | 7.77 billion constant LCU | 525.45 million constant LCU | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Latvia or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 9.02 billion constant LCU against 7.72 billion constant LCU in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Latvia and Lesotho?
- 1.29 billion constant LCU, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lesotho?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Lesotho rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Latvia ranks 138th and Lesotho ranks 135th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.