Kiribati vs Tonga: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Kiribati
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 292.73 million constant LCU against 122.32 million constant LCU in Kiribati, a difference of 170.41 million constant LCU.
That makes Tonga's figure about 2.4 times Kiribati's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 164th and Tonga ranks 161st of 167 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.08 million constant LCU | 149.05 million constant LCU | 119.97 million constant LCU | Tonga |
| 2010s | 60.66 million constant LCU | 209.72 million constant LCU | 149.05 million constant LCU | Tonga |
| 2020s | 79.00 million constant LCU | 265.73 million constant LCU | 186.73 million constant LCU | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Kiribati or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 292.73 million constant LCU against 122.32 million constant LCU in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Kiribati and Tonga?
- 170.41 million constant LCU, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tonga?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Tonga rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Kiribati ranks 164th and Tonga ranks 161st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.