Kiribati vs Marshall Islands: Gross fixed capital formation

Kiribati
122.32 million constant LCU
in 2024
Marshall Islands
60.68 million constant LCU
in 2024
Kiribati rank
164th
Marshall Islands rank
167th

Gross fixed capital formation over time

  • Kiribati
  • Marshall Islands
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M120.0M200420142024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 122.32 million constant LCU against 60.68 million constant LCU in Marshall Islands, a difference of 61.64 million constant LCU.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 2.0 times Marshall Islands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

Kiribati ranks 164th and Marshall Islands ranks 167th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Marshall Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 29.08 million constant LCU 44.35 million constant LCU 15.27 million constant LCU Marshall Islands
2010s 60.66 million constant LCU 52.11 million constant LCU 8.56 million constant LCU Kiribati
2020s 79.00 million constant LCU 56.07 million constant LCU 22.93 million constant LCU Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Kiribati or Marshall Islands?
Kiribati, at 122.32 million constant LCU against 60.68 million constant LCU in Marshall Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
61.64 million constant LCU, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Marshall Islands rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
Kiribati ranks 164th and Marshall Islands ranks 167th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Marshall Islands: Gross fixed capital formation. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu/kiribati/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu/kiribati/marshall-islands/">Kiribati vs Marshall Islands: Gross fixed capital formation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
167 places, 6,948 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.