Hungary vs Russia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Hungary
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 26.77 trillion constant LCU against 11.31 trillion constant LCU in Hungary, a difference of 15.46 trillion constant LCU.
That makes Russia's figure about 2.4 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Russia ahead.
Hungary ranks 20th and Russia ranks 17th of 167 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.38 trillion constant LCU | 12.06 trillion constant LCU | 6.69 trillion constant LCU | Russia |
| 2000s | 8.62 trillion constant LCU | 12.84 trillion constant LCU | 4.22 trillion constant LCU | Russia |
| 2010s | 9.72 trillion constant LCU | 19.66 trillion constant LCU | 9.93 trillion constant LCU | Russia |
| 2020s | 12.63 trillion constant LCU | 23.45 trillion constant LCU | 10.82 trillion constant LCU | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Hungary or Russia?
- Russia, at 26.77 trillion constant LCU against 11.31 trillion constant LCU in Hungary as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Hungary and Russia?
- 15.46 trillion constant LCU, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Russia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Russia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Hungary ranks 20th and Russia ranks 17th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.