El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation

El Salvador
8.08 billion constant LCU
in 2025
Zimbabwe
6.61 billion constant LCU
in 2024
El Salvador rank
137th
Zimbabwe rank
140th

Gross fixed capital formation over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zimbabwe
2.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B199020072025

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 8.08 billion constant LCU against 6.61 billion constant LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.46 billion constant LCU.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 137th and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 3.59 billion constant LCU 2.41 billion constant LCU 1.17 billion constant LCU El Salvador
2010s 3.86 billion constant LCU 4.73 billion constant LCU 864.88 million constant LCU Zimbabwe
2020s 5.63 billion constant LCU 5.54 billion constant LCU 92.81 million constant LCU El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
El Salvador, at 8.08 billion constant LCU against 6.61 billion constant LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
1.46 billion constant LCU, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
El Salvador ranks 137th and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu/el-salvador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu/el-salvador/zimbabwe/">El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
167 places, 6,948 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.