Ecuador vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Ecuador
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 25.65 billion constant LCU against 22.18 billion constant LCU in Ecuador, a difference of 3.47 billion constant LCU.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 119th and Panama ranks 117th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.05 billion constant LCU | 3.74 billion constant LCU | 6.31 billion constant LCU | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 11.90 billion constant LCU | 5.88 billion constant LCU | 6.01 billion constant LCU | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 22.13 billion constant LCU | 20.85 billion constant LCU | 1.28 billion constant LCU | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 20.14 billion constant LCU | 20.58 billion constant LCU | 440.28 million constant LCU | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Ecuador or Panama?
- Panama, at 25.65 billion constant LCU against 22.18 billion constant LCU in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Ecuador and Panama?
- 3.47 billion constant LCU, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Panama?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Panama rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Ecuador ranks 119th and Panama ranks 117th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.