Croatia vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Croatia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 22.18 billion constant LCU against 18.55 billion constant LCU in Croatia, a difference of 3.63 billion constant LCU.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 121st and Ecuador ranks 119th of 167 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.15 billion constant LCU | 10.58 billion constant LCU | 4.43 billion constant LCU | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 10.73 billion constant LCU | 11.90 billion constant LCU | 1.17 billion constant LCU | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 10.24 billion constant LCU | 22.13 billion constant LCU | 11.89 billion constant LCU | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 15.00 billion constant LCU | 20.48 billion constant LCU | 5.48 billion constant LCU | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Croatia or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 22.18 billion constant LCU against 18.55 billion constant LCU in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Croatia and Ecuador?
- 3.63 billion constant LCU, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Ecuador?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Ecuador rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Croatia ranks 121st and Ecuador ranks 119th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.