Congo vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation

Congo
1.45 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Serbia
1.85 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Congo rank
48th
Serbia rank
45th

Gross fixed capital formation over time

  • Congo
  • Serbia
01.0T2.0T3.0T4.0T198520052025

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 1.85 trillion constant LCU against 1.45 trillion constant LCU in Congo, a difference of 398.15 billion constant LCU.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 45th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Serbia Difference Ahead
1990s 593.41 billion constant LCU 334.08 billion constant LCU 259.33 billion constant LCU Congo
2000s 960.73 billion constant LCU 692.94 billion constant LCU 267.79 billion constant LCU Congo
2010s 2.16 trillion constant LCU 954.25 billion constant LCU 1.21 trillion constant LCU Congo
2020s 1.23 trillion constant LCU 1.63 trillion constant LCU 396.12 billion constant LCU Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Congo or Serbia?
Serbia, at 1.85 trillion constant LCU against 1.45 trillion constant LCU in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Congo and Serbia?
398.15 billion constant LCU, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Serbia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Congo and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
Congo ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 45th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu/congo-rep/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu/congo-rep/serbia/">Congo vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
167 places, 6,948 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.