Chile vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation

Chile
52.11 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
68.96 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Chile rank
13th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
10th

Gross fixed capital formation over time

  • Chile
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0T40.0T60.0T196019922025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 68.96 trillion constant LCU against 52.11 trillion constant LCU in Chile, a difference of 16.85 trillion constant LCU.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 13th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 10th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 11.49 trillion constant LCU 5.54 trillion constant LCU 5.96 trillion constant LCU Chile
2000s 23.39 trillion constant LCU 10.88 trillion constant LCU 12.51 trillion constant LCU Chile
2010s 42.39 trillion constant LCU 31.21 trillion constant LCU 11.17 trillion constant LCU Chile
2020s 47.92 trillion constant LCU 58.17 trillion constant LCU 10.25 trillion constant LCU Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Chile or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 68.96 trillion constant LCU against 52.11 trillion constant LCU in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Chile and Tanzania, United Republic of?
16.85 trillion constant LCU, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tanzania, United Republic of?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Chile and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
Chile ranks 13th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 10th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu/chile/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu/chile/tanzania/">Chile vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
167 places, 6,948 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.