Brazil vs Nepal: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Brazil
- Nepal
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 840.52 billion constant LCU against 758.68 billion constant LCU in Nepal, a difference of 81.84 billion constant LCU.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 57th and Nepal ranks 58th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 555.86 billion constant LCU | 284.25 billion constant LCU | 271.61 billion constant LCU | Brazil |
| 2010s | 771.64 billion constant LCU | 548.22 billion constant LCU | 223.42 billion constant LCU | Brazil |
| 2020s | 779.70 billion constant LCU | 814.25 billion constant LCU | 34.56 billion constant LCU | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Brazil or Nepal?
- Brazil, at 840.52 billion constant LCU against 758.68 billion constant LCU in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Brazil and Nepal?
- 81.84 billion constant LCU, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Nepal?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Nepal rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Brazil ranks 57th and Nepal ranks 58th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.