Belgium vs Lebanon: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Belgium
- Lebanon
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 125.53 billion constant LCU against 123.03 billion constant LCU in Lebanon, a difference of 2.50 billion constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lebanon ahead.
Belgium ranks 91st and Lebanon ranks 93rd of 167 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.19 billion constant LCU | 6.63 trillion constant LCU | 6.56 trillion constant LCU | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 85.99 billion constant LCU | 8.54 trillion constant LCU | 8.46 trillion constant LCU | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 103.00 billion constant LCU | 15.30 trillion constant LCU | 15.19 trillion constant LCU | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 119.02 billion constant LCU | 1.33 trillion constant LCU | 1.21 trillion constant LCU | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Belgium or Lebanon?
- Belgium, at 125.53 billion constant LCU against 123.03 billion constant LCU in Lebanon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Belgium and Lebanon?
- 2.50 billion constant LCU, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Lebanon?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Lebanon rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Belgium ranks 91st and Lebanon ranks 93rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.