Belarus vs Bolivia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Belarus
- Bolivia
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 54.75 billion constant LCU against 53.15 billion constant LCU in Belarus, a difference of 1.60 billion constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 107th and Bolivia ranks 105th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Bolivia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Bolivia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.23 billion constant LCU | 21.78 billion constant LCU | 5.55 billion constant LCU | Bolivia |
| 2000s | 27.53 billion constant LCU | 27.09 billion constant LCU | 431.68 million constant LCU | Belarus |
| 2010s | 55.46 billion constant LCU | 61.07 billion constant LCU | 5.61 billion constant LCU | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 44.82 billion constant LCU | 56.20 billion constant LCU | 11.38 billion constant LCU | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Belarus or Bolivia?
- Bolivia, at 54.75 billion constant LCU against 53.15 billion constant LCU in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Belarus and Bolivia?
- 1.60 billion constant LCU, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bolivia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Bolivia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Belarus ranks 107th and Bolivia ranks 105th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.