Bahamas vs Eritrea: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Bahamas
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 4.01 billion constant LCU against 3.72 billion constant LCU in Bahamas, a difference of 287.48 million constant LCU.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 148th and Eritrea ranks 147th of 167 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.54 billion constant LCU | 1.16 billion constant LCU | 382.21 million constant LCU | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 2.70 billion constant LCU | 1.47 billion constant LCU | 1.23 billion constant LCU | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 2.56 billion constant LCU | 2.36 billion constant LCU | 202.86 million constant LCU | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Bahamas or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 4.01 billion constant LCU against 3.72 billion constant LCU in Bahamas as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Bahamas and Eritrea?
- 287.48 million constant LCU, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eritrea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Bahamas and Eritrea rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Bahamas ranks 148th and Eritrea ranks 147th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.