Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP

Lithuania
0.1574 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0.1593 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lithuania rank
144th
Zimbabwe rank
142nd

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP over time

  • Lithuania
  • Zimbabwe
0.10.20.30.4199520102025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1593 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.1574 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0019 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Lithuania ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 168 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.1496 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2496 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.1 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0.1747 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2288 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.054 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0.1772 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.145 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0322 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp, Lithuania or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.1593 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.1574 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp between Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
0.0019 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp?
Lithuania ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/lithuania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/lithuania/zimbabwe/">Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 6,954 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.