How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?

16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP

Latvia

0.1589 constant LCU per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Zimbabwe

0.1593 constant LCU per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Latvia rank

143rd

Zimbabwe rank

142nd

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP over time

Latvia
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1593 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.1589 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0.0004 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Latvia ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 168 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.2089 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	0.2496 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	0.0406 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.2104 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	0.2288 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	0.0183 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2020s	0.1833 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	0.145 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	0.0383 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp, Latvia or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0.1593 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.1589 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp between Latvia and Zimbabwe?: 0.0004 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?: 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp?: Latvia ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/latvia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/latvia/zimbabwe/">Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 6,954 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.