Hong Kong vs United Arab Emirates: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Hong Kong
1.26 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
1.15 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2009
Hong Kong rank
89th
United Arab Emirates rank
91st
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP over time
- Hong Kong
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 1.26 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.15 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.11 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 89th and United Arab Emirates ranks 91st of 168 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp, Hong Kong or United Arab Emirates?
- Hong Kong, at 1.26 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.15 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp between Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.11 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2009.
- How do Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp?
- Hong Kong ranks 89th and United Arab Emirates ranks 91st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.