Australia vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP

Australia
0.3647 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Kiribati
0.3565 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Australia rank
112th
Kiribati rank
115th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP over time

  • Australia
  • Kiribati
0123196019922025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.3647 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.3565 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0082 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 112th and Kiribati ranks 115th of 168 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 0.5127 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2192 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2935 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Australia
2010s 0.3975 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2966 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.1009 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Australia
2020s 0.371 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.2728 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0982 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp, Australia or Kiribati?
Australia, at 0.3647 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 0.3565 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Kiribati as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp between Australia and Kiribati?
0.0082 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kiribati?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Australia and Kiribati rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per unit of gdp?
Australia ranks 112th and Kiribati ranks 115th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/kiribati/">Australia vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 6,954 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.