How many years of comparable data are there for Yemen and Zimbabwe?

10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Yemen vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Yemen

25,126 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2018

Zimbabwe

16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Yemen rank

157th

Zimbabwe rank

159th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

Yemen
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Yemen currently reports 25,126 constant LCU per square kilometre against 16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 8,229 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Yemen's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Yemen ahead.

Yemen ranks 157th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 165 countries.

Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Yemen	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	92,890 constant LCU per square kilometre	6,239 constant LCU per square kilometre	86,651 constant LCU per square kilometre	Yemen
2010s	36,660 constant LCU per square kilometre	12,116 constant LCU per square kilometre	24,545 constant LCU per square kilometre	Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Yemen or Zimbabwe?: Yemen, at 25,126 constant LCU per square kilometre against 16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2018.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Yemen and Zimbabwe?: 8,229 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Yemen ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Yemen and Zimbabwe?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
How do Yemen and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?: Yemen ranks 157th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Yemen vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/yemen-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/yemen-rep/zimbabwe/">Yemen vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: constant LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.