How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Zimbabwe?

15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

East Timor

22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

East Timor rank

158th

Zimbabwe rank

159th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

East Timor
Zimbabwe

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre against 16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 5,885 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

East Timor ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 165 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	East Timor	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	31,445 constant LCU per square kilometre	6,239 constant LCU per square kilometre	25,206 constant LCU per square kilometre	East Timor
2010s	39,817 constant LCU per square kilometre	12,217 constant LCU per square kilometre	27,600 constant LCU per square kilometre	East Timor
2020s	24,063 constant LCU per square kilometre	13,623 constant LCU per square kilometre	10,440 constant LCU per square kilometre	East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, East Timor or Zimbabwe?: East Timor, at 22,782 constant LCU per square kilometre against 16,897 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between East Timor and Zimbabwe?: 5,885 constant LCU per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Zimbabwe?: 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do East Timor and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?: East Timor ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/">East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: constant LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.